Training-Free Medical Image Segmentation vs Trained Networks

A multi-domain data-efficiency study — frozen LLM polygon traces + a numpy genome + a gated SAM decoder, with zero gradient training.

4 modalitiesmeasured, from scratch GT-free at inferenceLLM-agnostic skills updated 2026-07-02

Results — trained NN across N vs the LLM pipeline

NN Dice at matched budgets N = 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 (best seed), against the LLM pipeline (re-measured from scratch with the current config via eval_all_domains.py). The LLM's only label-fit module is a ~5–8-param genome; the rest is GT-free/frozen — so the LLM number is ~flat in N while the NN climbs.

DomainNN N=10N=25N=50N=100LLM pipeline
ISIC 2018 (derm)0.7750.8390.8640.8690.880
MSD Spleen (CT)0.5420.7360.8230.9320.840
Kvasir-SEG (endo)0.6130.7920.8460.8460.332
ChestXray (X-ray)0.9290.9460.9500.9540.825
NN = pretrained U-Net (best seed; ISIC = nnU-Net). An nnU-Net benchmark at N=10/25/50/100 for Spleen/Kvasir/CXR is running and will replace the U-Net columns when complete. LLM wins the scarce-label regime where it has a cue (ISIC at every N; Spleen through N=50, crossover ~N=55) and loses on no-cue targets (Kvasir polyp = structural ceiling; CXR = box-prompted-SAM ceiling, even a perfect GT box reaches only 0.943 < 0.953).

Data-efficiency

Matched data-efficiency: LLM pipeline (genome fit per N) vs trained NN
LLM pipeline (dashed — genome re-fit per N; ~flat) vs trained NN (solid — matched N). Spleen is capped at N=25 (30 training draws) and Kvasir at N=50 (91 draws).

Qualitative examples — 3 best / 3 worst per dataset

Green = ground truth, red = prediction. Top row = 3 highest-Dice cases, bottom row = 3 lowest.

ISIC 2018 — skin lesion (pigment cue, LLM's best domain)

ISIC best/worst

MSD Spleen — CT (localizer + within-volume prior)

Spleen best/worst
The worst cases are localizer failures (prediction lands on stomach/liver, Dice≈0) — exactly the slices the GT-free within-volume prior targets; the deployed pipeline recovers them to Dice 0.36–0.60 using confident sibling slices.

Kvasir-SEG — polyp (no GT-free cue: structural ceiling)

Kvasir best/worst
Even "best" cases are modest — polyps share color/texture with mucosa, so the coordinate draws mislocalize and SAM segments the wrong region. No GT-free signal fixes this (a redness-box lever was tested and rejected).

ChestXray — bilateral lungs (box-prompted SAM)

CXR best/worst
The worst cases miss the costophrenic recesses / a full lung field; a perfect GT box caps SAM at 0.943, below the trained U-Net's 0.953.

What we learned

Honest-reporting note: earlier drafts carried optimistic hardcoded values (ISIC 0.885, Kvasir 0.860, CXR 0.855). This report uses numbers re-measured from scratch with the current pipeline: ISIC 0.880, Kvasir 0.332, CXR 0.825.